As Jaws raked it in at the box office, a separate
movement was afoot in the genre. A character known as Leatherface had been
introduced months earlier in The Texas
Chainsaw Massacre. This behemoth was not some scientifically created
construct or experiment gone awry. Instead, he was merely the mentally stunted
offspring of a group of Texas inbreds with a very nasty hobby.
The definition
of a monster, according to The
American Heritage dictionary (2001, p. 549) is “1. A creature having a
strange or frightening appearance... 4. One who inspires horror or disgust.”
Technically, Leatherface can be categorized as such. However, in the horror genre, I must
interject a personal set of additional qualifiers: it must be otherworldly or inhuman. Having never been accused of political correctness,
I found something very unsavory about the portrayal of Leatherface.
A human being
can certainly act monstrous. He or she
can also act like a dog, a penguin, or an idiot. Mankind’s ability to commit atrocities can
never be called into question. Still, in
horror, a monster is not the person behind you in line for a latte. Certainly it is not a mentally handicapped
individual, nor is it somebody born with disfiguring birth defects.
The Texas Chainsaw Massacre must be
acknowledged as one of the catalysts that began the transformation of the genre
known as “horror” to that of “slasher”.
Whereas in horror, the evils
of mankind were represented by terrible monsters and denizens of the grave, the
slasher reduced the equation to its
simplest form: man is the new monster.
It is not
difficult to see Leatherface as a monstrosity.
Hanging a young woman from a meat-hook as she kicked, screamed, and
pleaded is certainly disquieting.
However, “he” is not a monster.
Leatherface is a mentally disturbed man conditioned by a family of
sociopaths. Despite his actions, at his
core he is indisputably human. If you
reside in the camp that considers the horror genre to be about monsters, then
The Texas Chainsaw Massacre cannot truly be considered
horror.
If I were to
apply the term “monster” to Leatherface, then that would not bode well for
James Espy. James was a junior high
school classmate of mine with the misfortune of being mentally
handicapped. In addition, he was
somewhat freakish in stature with a head that seemed twice as large as it
should be even on his gigantic frame.
Based on appearance alone, James could be considered a “monster.” It was well documented that James lacked the
capacity to discern between “right” and “wrong”. Horror is supposed to scare. The viewer should fear the monster. I was not afraid of James Espy. Likewise, I was not afraid of Leatherface,
and, I dare say, neither were audiences.
There is a difference between fear and disgust or revulsion.
Still, the genie
could not be put back in the bottle and what constituted horror was about to
undergo a shift. While a few stalwart
creatures lurked in the cinematic shadows, proper monsters were being brushed
aside. Horror was now becoming all about
the body count...and nothing has proved more adept at killing than mankind.
No comments:
Post a Comment